<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scrum Development Blog &#187; kanban vs scrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.3back.com/tag/kanban-vs-scrum/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.3back.com</link>
	<description>Better teams make better products.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kanban Vs. Scrum</title>
		<link>http://blog.3back.com/agile-pathway/kanban-vs-scrum</link>
		<comments>http://blog.3back.com/agile-pathway/kanban-vs-scrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The 3Back Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile Pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agile process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kanban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kanban vs scrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planceholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrum book]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3back.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as we love scrum, even we would have to admit that it’s not perfect. Nothing is.  In  fact, a  large part of our book describes workarounds  for various deficiencies that scrum presents to us in certain circumstances.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="Will Kanban replace Scrum?" href="http://advancedtopicsinscrum.com/faq/will-kanban-replace-scrum/">Will Kanban replace Scrum?</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Choose</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>No way, they are opposites: Kanban is for flow / <a href="http://3back.com/scrum">Scrum</a> batch<a href="http://blog.3back.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Kanban-scrum-flow.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-122" title="Kanban-scrum-flow" src="http://blog.3back.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Kanban-scrum-flow-300x215.png" alt="scrum flow kanban flow" width="300" height="215" /></a></li>
<li>Yes, Scrum is old school big planning steps</li>
<li>Yes, Kanban minimal planning / Scrum is heavy planning</li>
<li>No, Scrum can reduce to KanBan</li>
</ol>
<p>As much as we love scrum, even we would have to admit that it’s not perfect. Nothing is.  In  fact, a  large part of our <a title="Plain Language of Scrum" href="http://advancedtopicsinscrum.com/"><strong>book </strong></a>describes workarounds  for various deficiencies that scrum presents to us in certain circumstances.</p>
<p>One of the more commonly noted deficiencies in scrum is that it plans its work a whole Sprint at a  time.   This “batch” planning process  is often not agile enough  to cope with the actual rate of change of requirements.    In fact, Chapter 4.4 on <a title="Using Placeholder Stories" href="http://blog.3back.com/52/planning/placeholder-stories">PlaceHolder Stories</a>, the  discussion  of  the  mid-Sprint  Re-planning  in  Chapter  4.8,  and  the  discussion  of renegotiating the scope of a Sprint in Chapter 4.3 are all about resolving this deficiency.</p>
<p>There  is  another  agile  process,  called  KanBan,  which  solves  this  problem  and  is becoming popular  for  software development projects.  In our upcoming <a title="Scrum Topics" href="http://advancedtopicsinscrum.com/"><strong>book</strong></a> we will describe the main strength of KanBan and how to integrate it into scrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.3back.com/agile-pathway/kanban-vs-scrum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
