Will Kanban replace Scrum?

Choose

  1. No way, they are opposites: Kanban is for flow / Scrum batchscrum flow kanban flow
  2. Yes, Scrum is old school big planning steps
  3. Yes, Kanban minimal planning / Scrum is heavy planning
  4. No, Scrum can reduce to KanBan

As much as we love scrum, even we would have to admit that it’s not perfect. Nothing is.  In  fact, a  large part of our book describes workarounds  for various deficiencies that scrum presents to us in certain circumstances.

One of the more commonly noted deficiencies in scrum is that it plans its work a whole Sprint at a  time.   This “batch” planning process  is often not agile enough  to cope with the actual rate of change of requirements.    In fact, Chapter 4.4 on PlaceHolder Stories, the  discussion  of  the  mid-Sprint  Re-planning  in  Chapter  4.8,  and  the  discussion  of renegotiating the scope of a Sprint in Chapter 4.3 are all about resolving this deficiency.

There  is  another  agile  process,  called  KanBan,  which  solves  this  problem  and  is becoming popular  for  software development projects.  In our upcoming book we will describe the main strength of KanBan and how to integrate it into scrum.

Tagged with →  

One Response to Kanban Vs. Scrum

  1. kenley22 says:

    One of the criteria for selecting an agile tool in terms of Kanban or Scrum can be the time required. One of these methodology works well when there is shortage of time in terms of deadlines; the other one works well in situations where more time is required to carry out tasks when a diminutive iteration cannot satisfy the work. Get yourself scrum master Certified in http://www.scrumstudy.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *